• Seriously (or Humorously), Who Am I?

Shiny and Spanglered

~ Maybe a laugh can illuminate life.

Shiny and Spanglered

Tag Archives: abortion

Authority and Authoritarianism

28 Saturday Sep 2013

Posted by Shiny and Spanglered in American Life, Justice and Injustice, Religion and Society, Social Commentary

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, authoritarianism, authority, Catholic Church, contraception, doctrine, faith, gays, hope, liberals, non-Catholics, pope benedict, Pope Francis, religion, rules, vox papae, vox populi

images-32If, like me, you are non-Catholic and socially liberal, has it been slightly disorienting to find yourself cheering Pope Francis for his interview comments about the Church’s treatment of contraception, abortion, and homosexuality?

If we’re a little bewildered, it may be because we’re rooting for the A-Rod and the Yankees of the religious major leagues, the most powerful person in a powerful, influential, relentlessly hierarchical institution.  In the interview, Francis sounds like the humblest parish priest.  But a Pope is still the God-Father.

To make it even squirmier, we’re probably cheering, not in spite of the Church’s authoritarianism, but because of it.  After all, if the Pope had the same influence over his flock that John Boehner has over House Republicans, we wouldn’t give him the time of day.

Now, isn’t this an uncomfortable dilemma!  A bunch of liberals apparently conniving at authoritarianism.

But, perhaps we shouldn’t apologize too strenuously.  Maybe a little authoritarianism isn’t really so bad.  Parents know it isn’t.  Teachers are pretty sure it isn’t.  The inmates of my fantasy re-education camp for litterers have been forced to acknowledge that it isn’t.

As a nation, would we have made the same progress on civil rights if the federal government hadn’t cracked the whip?  On environmental cleanup, if emissions standards hadn’t been mandated?

So, where’s the balance?  I think it’s in finding the genuine authority within authoritarianism.  Pope Benedict was an authority on doctrine and rules, but not on the dilemmas and pains of the human heart.  He ruled by fiat.  Vox Papae over Vox Populi.  Edict over Bene. 

Francis, on the other hand, speaks first of the heart.  He understands that religion is barren if it doesn’t welcome, console, and inspire.  Still, he is very careful not to reject doctrine or rules (and, lest we liberals over-interpret, he does not say that the Church’s teachings on sexuality and procreation are wrong, just that they shouldn’t monopolize the conversation; nor does he promise a new role in the Church for women, saying simply that the question is vital and demands further investigation).

This is not Vox Populi over Vox Papae.  Rather, it’s Francis’s recognition that the voice of the Church must take account of the voice of the people, that its moral authority rests on its ability to listen, but also on its duty to fashion doctrine and rules that are right, temporally and eternally.  Authoritarianism tempered by authority, and vice versa.images-2

Karl Malden, as Father Barry in On the Waterfront, matched compassion with muscle.  You’ve probably seen the movie.  Now, see how Francis plays it.  Read the whole interview (at americamagazine.org/pope-interview).  It may not be life-or-death drama, but then, maybe it is.

Sin and Sincerity

18 Thursday Apr 2013

Posted by Shiny and Spanglered in American Life, Humor, Personal History, Religion and Society, Social Commentary

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Bible, catholics, church of christ, coffee, comfy chair, doing good, faith, faith and works, gays, inquisition, jews, missionaries, mormons, presbyterians, salvation, sin, social gospel, un-comfy chair, unitarians

images-3On my rounds putting up concert posters for my choral group, I regularly stop at local churches, synagogues, and coffee-houses. The coffee-houses win the Warm Welcome Prize hands down, but the Presbyterians, Evangelicals, and Church of Christers are close. The Catholics and Jews are ok — locked doors, but, once inside, the reception is reasonably friendly.

The mightiest fortress is the Unitarians.  You’d think they were guarding our gold supply.  Though it’s just one church, this saddens, but doesn’t surprise me, an erstwhile Unitarian.  Unitarianism is a flinty faith, really no faith at all, since human reason is its Bible and skepticism its catechism.  No dogma, no saints, but also no heretics.  If the Inquisitors had been Unitarians, torture would have been The Un-Comfy Chair.

These are admittedly limited encounters, but could they reflect differing attitudes toward missionizing?  Many Protestants are active missionizers.  They want to save souls, which starts with a smile, a hearty handshake, and a name badge.  Catholics are a little more cautious, perhaps because ethnicity is still an element of the faith (you can convert to Catholicism but not to Irishism or Polishism).  Judaism is staunchly non-missionizing.  Though you can convert, being a Jew is more genealogy than doctrine.  A non-believing Jew is still a Jew.  Ask a Cossack.

Unitarians, too, are non-missionizers.  Not that they wouldn’t, but that they can’t —  no hell to save you from, or heaven to save you for; no Christ to absolve your sins, nor any doctrine of sin from which to absolve you.  This was parodied hilariously in a Prairie Home Companion Joke Show:  What do you get when you cross a Unitarian with a Seventh-Day-Adventist?  Someone who knocks on people’s doors … for …  no … apparent … reason.

I agree with the Unitarian non-theology that considers God unknowable and Jesus simply a great man.  Still, self-styled intellectual superiority doesn’t excuse the closed door or the smugness that comes with smashing icons. What’s the matter with a little missionary-brand warmth, even if it’s only, Hi and welcome.  I can’t promise you an afterlife of eternal bliss, but how about some heavenly coffee that’ll at least give you a 30-minute buzz.

Though I can’t subscribe to the Biblical God, with or without Jesus Christ, I wouldn’t arbitrarily condemn the faiths founded thereon.  What real difference does it make what you believe, as long as you act rightly?

Take Mormonism, for example.  What little I know about Mormon theology utterly baffles me.  But I have also known and worked with a lot of Mormons, and found them to be good, warm people (though short on the coffee).  Because of?  In spite of?  Who cares?

Religiously-inspired social/political activism is a vital part of doing the right thing.  But here, beyond the simple person-to-person imperatives of being loving and kind, peaceful and generous, the question of acting rightly according to one’s religious lights gets complicated.

If the result is the anti-gay efforts of some Evangelicals, the answer seems simple — whatever the Bible may say, being hateful to those who are causing no harm to anyone is wrong.  If the result is the anti-abortion stance of the Catholic Church, answering the question — Which is the greater act of love and kindness, protecting a mother’s life (in all the meanings of “protection” and “life”) or that of an unborn child? — is anything but simple.  Nonetheless, the criteria are still:  whatever dogma may say, is the deed loving, kind, peaceful, and generous?

Even an unbeliever like me sometimes longs for a Judgment Day, when the sortingimages-2 would stand, not on whether Jesus saved you or you made the pilgrimage to Mecca, but whether (and to paraphrase a saying my mother stuck on the fridge), you have done something good for someone who will never be able to repay you.  Otherwise, the wages of being non-loving, non-peaceful, and unkind — especially to someone who is in a position to repay you — may be … well, just ask the guy on the right.

Archives

  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011

Blogroll

  • The Itty Bitty Bloghorn

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy